ROSS (@ROSSIntel) header
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile picture

ROSS

@ROSSIntel

The Future of Legal Research, Powered By Super Intelligence.

 San Francisco, CA
rossintelligence.com
Joined October 2014
  • Tweets5.9K
  • Following349
  • Followers5.5K
1.5KMedia
Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)Photo by ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
👀
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile pictureROSS
@ROSSIntel17h
“Common sense tells us this is not fair. And so does copyright law... Indeed, the Third Circuit flatly rejected a similar fair use argument in the case Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH v. ROSS Intelligence Inc., No. 25-2153, 2026 WL 2932557 (3d Cir. Sept. 29, 2026).” 👀
Image from ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
1
1
312
all these lawsuits are totally sustainable and the hallmark sign of healthy innovation first legal frameworks really great for the USA’s super intelligence startup ecosystem and a sure fire way to expand competitive US SI capabilities to compete with and beat foreign competitors
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau) profile pictureAdam Eisgrau
@AdamEisgrauOct 20
With 5 (count 'em) near identical suits filed in one day by 2 firms, mass tort theory, @edleeprof reports, may be the next big thing in the gen AI © legal "wars," noting @IsaiahPoritz's coverage for @BLaw:
Image from Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau)
3
9
514
Replying to @ROSSIntel
@RossIntel's request for more time to file its formal request for an en bank rehearing of a 3d Cir panel's decision against it in the @ThomsonReuters case has been ministerially granted. Look for that submission by or on 11/3:
Image from Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau)
1
1
3
493
how come no one is asking this?! strange, no?
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile pictureROSS
@ROSSIntelOct 13
And what companies does this model compete with?
Image from ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
1
8
441
what data was this trained on?
Z.ai (@Zai_org) profile pictureZ.ai
@Zai_orgOct 12
Introducing GLM-Legal Built on GLM-5.3-Flash, GLM-Legal matches frontier models on mainstream legal benchmarks. Designed for real legal workflows: contract review, evidence analysis, compliance, and more. Tech Blog: z.ai/blog/glm-legal Apply for API Access: z.ai/consultation/legal Try AutoClaw: autoclaw.z.ai
Image from Z.ai (@Zai_org)
7
4
29
5,487
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
Bloomberg (@business) profile pictureBloomberg
@businessOct 10
The most likely long-term outcome of the AI boom will be massive capital destruction in the US, with market share going to cheaper open-source Chinese models, according to Jefferies. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Jefferies’ Chris Wood Sees ‘Massive Capital Destruction’ in AI

Jefferies’ Chris Wood Sees ‘Massive Capital Destruction’ in AI

The most likely long-term outcome of the AI boom will be massive capital destruction in the US, with market share going to cheaper open-source Chinese models, according to Jefferies Financial Group...

bloomberg.com
1
5
422
AI copyright litigation in the USA is brought to you by Franz Kafka
Andrew Curran (@AndrewCurran_) profile pictureAndrew Curran
@AndrewCurran_Oct 11
HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, and Hachette are using Claude and ChatGPT to email literary agents, write publicity and back-cover copy, design cover art, marketing materials, and draft rejection letters. AI use among authors is apparently also rampant now behind the scenes.
Image from Andrew Curran (@AndrewCurran_)
2
11
761
👀
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile pictureROSS
@ROSSIntelOct 9
“ROSS is the only appellate guidance available, and it should inform every AI training-data decision now.” bakerdonelson.com/third-circ…
Image from ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
1
3
427
Breaking: @RossIntel will soon, but not yet, move for an en banc rehearing of the recent 3d Circ panel decision against it in @ThomsonReuter's © infringement suit. For now, they've filed a 21-day extension to make that ask, which plaintiffs' do not oppose:
Image from Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau)
Image from Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau)
Image from Adam Eisgrau (@AdamEisgrau)
1
1
3
235
funny how things go
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile pictureROSS
@ROSSIntelOct 7
The rest, as they say, is history. ROSS Intelligence was one of OpenAI’s first ever GPT-3 partners, helping OpenAI “refine their API…testing its accuracy, speed, flexibility, and usefulness in the legal domain.” And then we were sued by Thomson Reuters.
Image from ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
1
5
439
many people are saying
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
The Redline (@theredlinehq) profile pictureThe Redline
@theredlinehqOct 5
TRACKED CHANGES: Thomson Reuters bought Casetext, a cheaper rival to Westlaw, then shut it down. A law firm says its monthly bill more than tripled as a result. Now it's leading a proposed class action against Thomson Reuters, ABA Journal reports.
Image from The Redline (@theredlinehq)
Image from The Redline (@theredlinehq)
1
1
8
1,449
“Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions.”
Bottomless Pit Supervisor, Esq. (@JesterInABarrel) profile pictureBottomless Pit Supervisor, Esq.
@JesterInABarrelOct 3
Replying to @syfert
I wouldn’t sleep on it. Will depend on discovery and expert reports, but I think it has legs. Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions. See Steves & Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., 988 F.3d 690 (4th Cir. 2021), affirming 345 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Va. 2018).
1
1
6
4,661
Replying to @syfert
I wouldn’t sleep on it. Will depend on discovery and expert reports, but I think it has legs. Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions. See Steves & Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., 988 F.3d 690 (4th Cir. 2021), affirming 345 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Va. 2018).
1
1
6
799
“Products blamed for incorrect citations: Westlaw for buying and raising the price on Casetext”
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
andrew arruda (@andrewarruda) profile pictureandrew arruda
@andrewarrudaFeb 6
“Products blamed for incorrect citations: Westlaw for buying and raising the price on Casetext”
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
2
5
446
👀
andrew arruda (@andrewarruda) profile pictureandrew arruda
@andrewarruda25 Jun 2024
a @thomsonreuters @westlaw/@casetext story in 3 parts
Image from andrew arruda (@andrewarruda)
1
1
457
.@musicbizworld ran the math on what the TR v. ROSS decision means for Suno 60,202 recordings in the second suit, at the statutory maximum, is a ceiling just over $9 billion
ROSS (@ROSSIntel) profile pictureROSS
@ROSSIntelOct 5
“A market for licensing training data counts even if the rights holder never licensed into it... Suno pleads 60,202 recordings... that is a theoretical ceiling of just over $9 billion on the second suit alone.” musicbusinessworldwide.com/a…
Image from ROSS (@ROSSIntel)
2
1
407
2
4
162
The Supreme Court has made it clear: copyright is NOT monopolization. Fair use is supposed to prevent that. The Third Circuit whent against that to protect Westlaw's monopoly. nitter.cf/shanedk/status/2106422…

Third Circuit opinion is BLATANT monopolization!

The Third Circuit in Thomson Reuters v. Ross went against DECADES of Supreme Court precedent to protect the Westlaw monopoly, the exact kind of monopolization fair use is supposed to prevent!

Shane Killian (@shanedk) profile pictureShane Killian
@shanedkOct 3
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes: They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says. Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
1
1
5
658
god bless @shanedk
Shane Killian (@shanedk) profile pictureShane Killian
@shanedkOct 3
This is how ridiculous the "creative spark" is!
2
1
5
446
This is how ridiculous the "creative spark" is!
Shane Killian (@shanedk) profile pictureShane Killian
@shanedkOct 3
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes: They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says. Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
1
2
1
5
661
Load more